Friday, September 03, 2010
posted 06/22/09 09:35 AM | updated 07/07/09 03:06 PM
Views: 311 | Comments : 20 | News

Obama signs strong US anti-smoking bill

Will this encourage people to stop smoking or not start in the first place? Or is it too much government control?


PHILIP ELLIOTT
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama cited his own long struggle to quit the cigarettes he got hooked on as a teenager as he signed the strongest-ever U.S. anti-smoking bill Monday and praised it for providing critically needed protections for kids.
"The decades-long effort to protect our children from the harmful effects of tobacco has emerged victorious," Obama said at a signing ceremony in the White House Rose Garden.
The bill marks the latest legislative victory for Obama's first five months. Among his other successes: a $787 billion economic stimulus bill, legislation to expand a state program providing children's health insurance and a bill making it easier for workers to sue for pay discrimination.
The president has frequently spoken, in the White House and on the campaign trail, of his own struggles to quit smoking. He brought it up during Monday's ceremony while criticizing the tobacco industry for marketing its products to young people.
Obama said almost 90 percent of people who smoke began at age 18 or younger, snared in a dangerous and hard-to-kick habit.
"I know — I was one of these teenagers," Obama said. "So I know how difficult it can be to break this habit when it's been with you for a long time."
Before dozens of invited guests, including children from the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, the president signed legislation giving the Food and Drug Administration unprecedented authority to regulate tobacco.
Obama accused the tobacco industry of targeting young people, exposing them to a "constant and insidious barrage of advertising where they live, where they learn and where they play. Most insidiously, they are offered products with flavorings that mask the taste of tobacco and make it even more tempting."
The new law bans candy and fruit flavors in tobacco products, and it limits advertising that could attract young people.
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act also allows the FDA to lower the amount of addiction-causing nicotine in tobacco products and block misleading labels such "low tar" and "light." Tobacco companies also will be required to cover their cartons with large graphic warnings.
The law won't let the FDA ban nicotine or tobacco outright.
"It is a law that will save American lives," Obama said.
Anti-smoking advocates looked forward to the bill after years of attempts to control an industry so fundamental to the U.S. that carved tobacco leaves adorn some parts of the Capitol building.
Opponents from tobacco-growing states such as top-producing North Carolina argued that the FDA had proved through a series of food safety failures that it was not up to the job of regulation. They also said that instead of unrealistically trying to get smokers to quit or to prevent others from starting, lawmakers should ensure that people have other options, like smokeless tobacco.
As president, George W. Bush opposed the legislation and threatened a veto after it passed the House last year. The Obama administration, by contrast, issued a statement declaring strong support for the measure.

Tags: obama, smoking, bill
CommentsRSS Feed
Keep it clean, keep it civil, keep it truthful, stay on topic, be responsible. Share your knowledge and please suggest removal of comments that violate these standards.
I'll quit when Obama the Statist quits.
Comment by anonymous
June 22, 2009
( 0 votes )
Mr. Obama is not interested in protecting the youth or the smoking population from the dangers of tobacco, he wants to control the revenues of Tobacco companies to enforce his socialistic agenda. I don't smoke but I believe that people should be free to choose what they want to do with their health. The only thing we can do to help smokers is by encouraging them to quit by programs already available in the community. We already have plenty information around and laws to protect second hand smokers. We just need to enforce these laws. The cost of health insurance for smokers should be higher because of the illnesses and cancers associated with tobacco addiction. Those who do not have access to health insurance can be treated through social programs paid by tobacco companies.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
Do you have any idea how much smoking costs this country in health care? Tax them $20 a pack and use that to pay for health care!!!!
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
IF you tax the tobacco too much it will create a black market, thus organized crime will be on the rise. Don't believe me? I know people who buy cigs and chew black market in California.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
Yeah, when I lived on the east coast 30 years ago people went to the south to get their smaokes. The avg. joe won't have that kind of access. Tax them until people can't afford to smoke.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
Whatever - there are more pressing issues that Mr. Obama and Congress needs to be addressing. We are literally watching our country go to hell in a handbasket! Let me just name a few things that make me say this: First of all, I do not consider Mr. Obama my president. That title can only be held by a natural born citizen, for which he has not qualified yet by showing his Long-Form Birth Certificate (Short-Form Certificates of Live Birth won't even get you a driver's license in Hawaii). Until that is put to rest, he is nothing more than a usurper, and I refuse to call him President. And Obama's actually tri-racial. He's 50% white, 6.5% black, and the rest is arabic. So, he's not even enough black to be called black. So why doesn’t anyone correct this? Even Obama doesn’t have the integrity to admit that he is NOT African American! This mess that Obama has gotten our country into in just 5 short months, is nothing short of corruption! Just imagine what he is going to do with the remaining 3 1/2 years he has! He is a socialist, and anyone who cannot see that is truly blind! We can't wait for the media to blow any whistles, not while they have idiots working for them who actually make statements like these two: "I feel shivers running up my leg when I'm around him" and “No, Obama's not just a normal man, he's a god." The morons who said those things work for the major networks and have full-time jobs as 'news' anchors. Reporting as professional journalists is not being sycophantish droolers over a narcississitic fool. Abuse of power doesn't even come close to what Mr. Obama is really doing. It's treason and blasphemy. He believes he is a god who can control what other countries do just by showing up and telling them whatever he thinks they need to be told. We are slowly losing our freedom! Mr. Obama wants to take away every freedom that we have in this country...explain to me how the president of our country has the RIGHT to fire the CEO of General Motors?? I am actually in favor trying Mr. Obama for treason along with 99% of the other politicians nationwide who seek for federal office. I say 99% rather than 100% because I do believe there are a very few who have integrity. Another topic: When we have a GAY man judging a WOMEN'S BEAUTY PAGEANT doesn’t anyone see that there is something wrong!? Call me dense, but why would a gay man be the judge of a beauty pageant? That is like asking a person who makes tires to put the engine in a car! He didn't even qualify as a judge & has no business even being there!
Comment by piglet
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
You looked silly after your first point. I could not finish the rest of your blog. Turn of Rush, come back to the real world, and then maybe you will have some credibility.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
What exactly did piglet say that was false?
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
Piglet lost me at the birth cert. controversy. He was elected, that topic is over, move on.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
To the anonymous poster: Instead of discrediting something as drivel, how about you come up with something intelligent? This site is a source for collaborating ideas. What is not welcome is a totalitarian viewpoint, where you have no tolerance for an opinion different that yours, all the while not providing anything worth while to everyone else on the site. Obviously you spent the time to put a post on here, yet your post proves to be even more useless than the post you're attempting to discredit.

Back on topic...

I believe that the government is not capable of making better decisions than the individual citizens. The government should not get involved. It is also true that an increase in taxes will - and has - lead to a black market.
Comment by unboxed
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
The post was way off topic and had no creditabilty when the person started to rehash the election.
Comment by anonymous
June 23, 2009
( 0 votes )
I wish more people will see that Obama's true motives is to control freedom to choose and ability to overcome our own weakness. He wants us to become dependent from the government at the social, financial , and personal level. He wants to replace the American dream for the Obama's dream. He is not really against Tobacco companies, because they are a good source of revenue for the government. He said that he still smokes occasionally, not in front of his daughters. There is a room in the White House to smoke. What does this tell you about his character? Like everything else he wants others to do something than he can not do even for himself. This is just another way to create disunite in the population. So far is working.
Comment by incaprincess
June 24, 2009
( 0 votes )
Perhaps he does not want to see others stuggle with smoking as he does, but I guess that answer is too simple. It's always better to assume that he wants to control us. I guess the illegal wiretaps Bush did was ok.
Comment by anonymous
June 24, 2009
( 0 votes )
I have seem first hand the negative influences of tobacco in smokers. I don't wish anybody to suffer or become dependent on a deadly habit such tobacco and other substances. I have tried to help some smokers to quick the habit but it is very hard because 1- No will power 2- Do not want to leave friends that smoke 3-No commitment to the program 3- Has given up 4- Don't want to try as many times as they need to. On the other hand I met others that have overcame their problem with their faith and trust in God. God has given us free agency to choose between good and evil. Sometimes we choose to do bad and suffer terrible consequences. Most of the time we can recover from our mistakes and we learn to be wiser. I have more faith in God and man's abilities to help himself  rather than Obama and his policies.
Comment by incaprincess
June 24, 2009
( 0 votes )
Well you got God into this one too. Did you ever think some people like to smoke? Just for the pure enjoyment the actually like it? My parents both smoked, my dad for 65 years. It was promoted by the Marlboro man has something to make you look sexy back in the seventies. When I went to the store to get my dad's smokes they were .55 a pack. They gave me the matches to go with them. I think the current administration is trying to make it as difficult to get them as possible. If this would of happened thirty years ago, smoking would not have been the issue it is today.
Comment by anonymous
June 24, 2009
( 0 votes )
Would not be an issue? Maybe not at the local store, but there would certainly be a black market. Why do people always look to the government to solve their problems? The government cannot solve its own problems and people look to them for the cure-all. Will you all ever learn?
Comment by anonymous
June 24, 2009
( 0 votes )
I don't think smokers are looking to the goverment to help them quit. It's the health problems that come with smoking that are in turn raising health care costs. The uninsured then have to have the goverment pay for these costs. Make smokes so expensive, people can't afford them then in turn they will quit and health care costs go down. Yes maybe a small black market, but you got any other ideas?
Comment by anonymous
June 25, 2009
( 0 votes )
People are entitled to choose their own path. Consuming tobacco is not the way to live a healthy life. The negative side of smoking is that it affects others besides the smoker. I remember the time when my son's best friend had to be taken to the emergency room because his lungs collapsed due to constant exposure to smoking. He was only 8 years old. He almost died that day. His parents were heavy smokers. Every winter he suffered with bronchitis and got very sick. Due to this incident the dad stopped smoking, the mom didn't. She got very sick often and her lungs were bad but the addition was more powerful that her own will. Those who choose to smoke must understand that it doesn't matter how they excuse this habit there will be consequences and they must be prepared to pay for their own medical bills.
Comment by incaprincess
June 25, 2009
( 0 votes )
What do you do with people that don't have health coverage. We pay. I heard a republican say he thought we should have a 2000.00 tax credit so people could use that to buy health insurance. I can tell you people would use it for everything but that. How many retire with no savings? Its a sad fact, but some will just always be a burden to society and there is nothing the rest of us can do about it.
Comment by anonymous
June 25, 2009
( 0 votes )
Speaking as an ex-smoker of 15 years and quit for 15 years (I was a 16 year old beginner....not because the ads made it look cool, though) I find it amazing that the cigarette packages will be required to display larger warnings/graphics (I have even heard that they will need to show pictures of the effects of smoking...i.e. a diseased lung maybe?). Do they really think that people don't know the warnings and side effects of smoking? Wouldn't and didn't bother me one bit, I still smoked. How about them required large warnings/graphics on alcoholic beverages......I don't have statistics but I'm thinking alcohol related accidents take out more innocent lives than smoking!! And maybe all the beer(can you say the Bud Bowl?!) and alcohol commercials should be banned like tobacco has been. And hey, while we're at it - let's make them put a big ole' tub of fat on the counter of a fast food restaurant so people can see the dangers of eating super-sized burgers!! The point is, enougn is enough. Do not pick on one industry if you aren't going to pick on all of them!!
Comment by anonymous
June 30, 2009
( 0 votes )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: