|
|
Are you sure you want to report the following content as a violation?
|
|
|
|
In the words of Justice Potter Stewart in his concurrence in Jacobellis V. Ohio (1964): "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [of obscenity]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Thus the question becomes, is the drawing obscene? Whether children are viewing it or not is irrelevant (as parents should censor the content from their children, not the government.) The relevant issue is whether this picture is obscene, or artistic. Was its intent to excite the base desires of the carnal mind? I think clearly the answer is no. No black bars, no nothing. This piece should have been shown as is. They allow naked women in African tribes to be filmed and shown on the discovery channel, but a girl can't tastefully DRAW a representation of the naked female form? This, my friends, is why John Stuart Mill felt literally NO censorship of...
|
|
|
|
Please check the following violations, and include anything else in the comment box. |
|
|
| Comment |
|
|
| Captcha |
|
Please enter the text from the image above
|
|
|
