|
|
Are you sure you want to report the following content as a violation?
|
|
|
|
Debating the war in Iraq leads us to three fundamental questions that need to be addressed. They are as follows:
1) What is victory?
2) Is victory worth the cost?
3) What are the repurcussions for failure?
Let's get into each of these. I would greatly enjoy anybody's input on the matter. Tell me why I'm wrong.
1) Victory is defined (in my estimation) as establishing a stable, liberal democracy in Iraq that is capable of acting autonimously and as an ally to the war on terror. Why is defining this so difficult?
2) With the drastic amount spent in terms of dollars and blood, it is entirely understandable why people are so impatient with our situation. It is also understandable for people to be frustrated over the decision to invade to begin with. Nevertheless, a historical perspective must be made here. In WWII, (according to Robert Samuelson of Newsweek) the US spent a massive 38% of the gross domestic...
|
|
|
|
Please check the following violations, and include anything else in the comment box. |
|
|
| Comment |
|
|
| Captcha |
|
Please enter the text from the image above
|
|
|
