Search:

En
About Ike


Real Name:
ike evans
Gender:
male
Date of Birth:
April 18, 1980
Member Since:
April 06, 2008
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2008
Profile Views:
308
Blog Views:
392
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The Blogger's World
Joe's Oil
Editorial Cartoons
Rants of the Play by Play
Oil and the Economy
The New Iraq Policy
The Iraqi Standoff
Farm Bill
Idaho's Nuclear Future
Retreat
Archives
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Ike - > En -> Farm Bill
Farm Bill
As reported in the ISJ, congress has just spent a super-massive 290 billion clams on a new farm/nutrition/bioenergy bill.  This really shows our government operating at its worst in modern times.  The bill is so fiscally irresponsible, so full of pork, so full of bail-outs and entitlements, so full of anti-competition, so full of waste, so full of business-as-usual-spend-like-there's-no-tomorrow antics.  This bill is really really bad, and the president is powerless to stop it, despite a vow to veto. 

This is proof that almost nobody is really serious about fiscal responsibility.  Larry Craig, Mike Crapo, Mike Simpson, and Bill Sali, who all act as Idaho's representation in congress, all voted for this bill.  I can't think of anybody who gets on his soap box more than Craig when it comes to preaching about balancing the budget.

All the major presidential candidates failed to vote at all on this legislation; how convenient.  Ron Paul, to his credit, actually voted against the bill.

Republicans accuse democrats of being spend happy.  Democrats accuse Republicans of being spend happy.  They're both correct about the other, and the hypocrisy runs deep.
Topics:
posted by Ike on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 02:08 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 19 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by aalder on May 18, 2008 at 12:40 PM
Wow, this is a huge claim, where were you able to look at the bill to know this? Is this bill something that is accessible to others? And what can citizens do to stop it?
posted by Ike on May 19, 2008 at 01:47 AM
Thanks for the question.  We need more involvement and discussion around here.  On a complete side note, I checked out your website, and your pictures are very good.

Back onto subject:
I haven't looked at the bill line by line because it's just too big.  But there are several things I know from research I've done:

The bill extends subsidies for corn ethanol, which is bad for the environment, bad for the economy, bad for working class, etc etc.
Ethanol from corn is just plain bad in countless different ways but congress has decided we need more of it.

The bill gives subsidies to huge corporate farms that are already making money out their ears.  Experts in agriculture (non politicians) in both liberal and conservative camps fully acknowledge the egregiousness of subsidizing the farm industry as a whole.  This bill only makes it worse.

The bill strengthens other welfare related items like food stamps.  This discourages individual responsibility and initiative, while making government bigger and our economy more hamstrung by entitlement spending.

Now these are only some of the issues that this bill covers.  The main overarching argument against this bill is also the most basic:  The bill cost $290 billion, with a range of spending expenditures over a range of different issues.  Bills like this can't help but come with a load of pork on board.  To break up the bill and focus on individual issues allowing for more concise spending is much wiser.  Otherwise, you have this massive "take it or leave it" bill that allows for all sorts of garbage to make its way in.  The fact that this comes out on an election year is all too coincidental. 

Researching the bill is rather easy.  Any search engine will give you a ton of information from several reputable web sites.  What can we do to stop this kind of crud from going on?  I suppose the only answer I have is to keep this in mind when you vote this November.  To their credit, both Obama and McCain have signed pledges against pork spending.  We'll see if they really mean it.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.