Friday, September 03, 2010
posted 02/03/10 03:00 PM | updated 02/03/10 03:00 PM

Should the Cheyenne connector project be completed? Or would it ruin the natural area?

By Sean Ellis

sellis@journalnet.com

    POCATELLO — The long-planned Cheyenne Connector project is stuck in the final design stage and will only move forward once Pocatello’s Portneuf River levees are recertified by the federal government.

    The connector is intended to improve east-west traffic flow from Bannock Highway to South Fifth Avenue and bypass the dangerous Cheyenne Avenue railroad 

crossing, the site of several fatal accidents over its history, including one in 1995 that resulted in the death of a local woman and her son.

    City officials previously hoped to see construction on the $17 million project started this summer.

    “That’s not going to happen,” said interim City Engineer Deirdre Castillo.

    The project is being funded by federal money, but the city will need to pay about 7 percent of the total cost.

    The project has been in the planning stages since 1998, but it has been delayed numerous times due to environmental concerns, funding and now the levees, which were decertified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2008.

    If the levees aren’t recertified by FEMA, Castillo said, the city would have to build a three-span bridge over the river instead of the currently planned two-span bridge. That would make the price tag bigger than the city can afford because the project engineer would need to be paid more money to design the new structure.

    Castillo said the city is already doing everything it can to meet its share of the cost.

    “We can’t afford a bigger bridge,” she said.

    City officials will meet Monday with the project engineering consultant and state officials to discuss the project.

    Not everyone wants to see the project move forward, however. Johnny Creek resident Kay Merriam said she has gathered the signatures of more than 500 people who are opposed to it. Merriam doesn’t believe it’s the wisest use of the money, and she’s also concerned about how the project would affect aesthetics in that area.

    “A lot of people feel that saving 10 minutes to get into town is not a worthy use of ($17 million),” she said. “I’m strongly concerned about the aesthetics of it. It’s such a beautiful area.”

    The project, also known as the South Valley Connector, will feature a two-lane road and will include a shared-use path for pedestrians and bicyclists. It will tie in to AMI/Kirkham Trail and South Second Avenue.

    Once the project is completed, the plan is to close the Cheyenne railroad crossing. However, the bridge on Cheyenne that crosses the Portneuf River and handles 1,500 to 2,000 vehicle trips daily is nearing the end of its lifespan and might not last until the project is completed.

    If it doesn’t survive that long, motorists trying to get to that area would have to travel further north through the downtown area, or further south through the Portneuf Gap area.

    Randy Ghezzi, Pocatello’s street superintendent and traffic engineer, said the connector would handle future growth in the area, alleviate traffic pressure in the downtown area, and allow traffic to flow uninterrupted between Bannock Highway and South Fifth.

    FEMA began taking a second look at levees around the nation after Hurricane Katrina and decertified Pocatello’s levees in 2008. Ghezzi said the city is working hard to get them recertified and recently sent a report to the Army Corps of Engineers updating the agency on Pocatello’s efforts and asking it to recommend FEMA recertify the levees quickly.

    Ghezzi and Public Works Director Greg Lanning will discuss the report during the City Council’s regular study session Feb. 11 and will ask for the council’s direction on the issue. 

CommentsRSS Feed
Keep it clean, keep it civil, keep it truthful, stay on topic, be responsible. Share your knowledge and please suggest removal of comments that violate these standards.
No.
We cannot even afford to fix the bridges we currently have. We're soliciting the federal government for money to fix the Benton Street Bridge. How do you think we're going to be able to afford to maintenance this huge crossing? Please do not go through with the construction of this bridge.
Comment by Wow, no comments. Not surpris
7 months ago
( +1 votes )
Cheyenne connector
Yes. The connector needs to be built. The current bridge is falling apart and something will need to be done. We have lived in the area for over 20 years and there has been talk of replacing the bridge with an overpass ever since we moved in. In that time the traffic along Bannock Highway and South Second has increassed dramatically. Also South Second is a hazard itself. Many people ride their bikes and jog along that road. There are some places where there are no shoulders. It is a wonder no one has been hit. Nothing has been said about the numerous people who have been killed on that road not including at the crossing. The lights from oncoming trains can be blinding.
The Cheyenne bridge will need to be replaced. Why not build something that will help solve the traffic problems we have now.
Comment by Hiker
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
Cheyenne connector
The connector needs to be built. There is major traffic congestion in the Ross Park Fredregill area. All the concerns were studied several years ago and the decision was made to build the connector. I walk and bike the AMI trail and can see no problem with an overpass over the trail. Natural habitat will not be ruined. People against this now will be the ones most vocal when traffic increases in future years.
Comment by dean
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
Cheyenne Connector
Yes the connector needs to be built. It should have been built 10 years ago. The Cheyenne road from Ross Park across the RR tracks has had seven (7) fatalities by my recent recollection. It has to be one of the most dangerous roads in Pocatello. It is just a matter of time before there are more serious accidents and fatalaties, especially with increased traffic and more joggers and cyclists, not to mention the children that walk along Cheyenne where there are no sidewalks. Let's get serious about this and quit finding petty reasons to delay this important project.
Comment by George
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
RE: Cheyenne Connector
It is not correct to say that seven deaths have taken place at the Cheyenne crossing! The two deaths that did take place at the Cheyenne crossing were the responsibility of the woman who drove her car around two or three cars while the red lights were flashing and bell(s) were ringing. Since then the bars were installed and no one has died. (Unless you want to count the high school student who did not make the curve on Second as he was approaching the crossing going at a very high rate of speed.
Comment by K Merriam
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
Cheyenne Connector
No. I live in the Indian Hills area and the most traffic uses Bannock Highway. Bannock highway will need to be upgraded to handle future traffic. We need to repair the present bridge with a new overpass in its present location. This will save the taxpayers money. Do not disturb the trail area and do not put the trail in a tunnel, this can be a hazard.
Comment by George
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
yes
we do need it and why not build it?, a local project in Pocatello always is a great boost for Utahs economy, just like the new hospital we can hire a bunch of out of state people to come work on a local project and tell all the local people who are out of work that maybe they need to move out of state to find work.
Comment by steveo12
6 months ago
( 0 votes )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: